analytics

Google SERPs New Anchor Testing

As you know Google recently caused havoc for some analytics platforms by including #anchors (aka pound signs, fragment identifiers) in SERP URLs. Just a quick post today to mention they’re back! Noticed #anchors in my SERPs this morning and I’ve been seeing them on and off all day.

Update – Matt Cutts confirmed this issue last week but I haven’t seen any hints of the new testing until now. Hat tip to Barry for the 411! :) Thanks to Ionut Alex Chitu for emailing to also point out that Google’s new Wonder Wheel feature launched earlier this week, always uses AJAX URLs with #anchors. It’s going to be interesting to see what impact this change has on various tools, something to be aware of for sure….

  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmark
  • StumbleUpon

 

TinyURL SEO

A friend of mine recently emailed to ask, how TinyURL impacts SEO? It’s a good question and one many folks can’t answer so, I thought I’d blog my answer to his question!

For anyone not familiar with TinyURL, in layman terms it’s a tool where users can enter long displaying URLs to get a shortened version. TinyURLs are often used where long URLs might wrap and therefore break, such as in email or social media web applications like Twitter. In more technical terms, TinyURLs are short, dynamically created URLs that redirect users to another intended URL via 301 redirect. Because TinyURLs “301″ or permanently redirect, search engines should not index the TinyURL but instead should index and pass PageRank to the actual URL.

It is important to note, TinyURLs to paid links passing PageRank is a violation of Google Webmaster Guidelines and that sites like Twitter use nofollow techniques to prevent spam.

On their own, TinyURLs can be search engine friendly from a technical perspective. At the same time, I wouldn’t suggest replacing your site’s navigation with TinyURLs and would point out that tracking TinyURLs via analytics might be difficult.

  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmark
  • StumbleUpon

 

Average Number of Words In A Query Are 4

In case you missed it, I recently posted that Google’s “Average Number of Words Per Query have Increased!” In response, JohnW raised a very good question about how Google calculated this number and whether or not it’s a rounded number.

Avinash Kaushik, Analytics Evangelist for Google and author of the book “Web Analytics: An Hour A Day” responded to my request for clarification on this topic via email earlier today. I asked Avinash how Google calculated this figure and if Google rounded up, for example if 3.?? was rounded to 4 or if the actual value is equal to or greater than 4?

Here is what Avinash said:
“I believe that the right term is “average number of words in a query” are 4. I did not get enough clarity if it is 3.6 or 4.2. But none the less it was a movement from 3 to 4.”

So in answer to JohnW’s question it does seem likely that this number is round. Either way, the number is officially 4!

Thanks Avinash & JohnW!

  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmark
  • StumbleUpon